45 Cycles

Unable to find an answer to the question that has been bugging me for a while now using internet searches, this morning I decided to resort to the old fashioned telephone method to find out whether the PCR test is what is being used in Ontario to come up with the recent pandemic of scary headlines about "case" numbers in this province.

I also wanted to know what the amplification cycle number is for Ontario PCR tests, given that even St. Fauci has declared that anything more than 35 cycles is utterly useless in determining the presence of the WuFlu.

It took me about an hour and at least six calls to get some answers.

What I found out was rather shocking from more than one angle.

First, and not so shocking, yes, the PCR test is the one used to determine the number of "cases" in Ontario.

Second, and this came as a bit of a shock to me even though it shouldn't have, a tech at an Ontario Lab facility told me that they are using 45 cycles in their PCR tests.

45!

Then I guess he got a bit nervous as happens in Sovietized societies when one realizes that, perhaps, one has said too much and he asked,

"Don't mention that I told you anything about this (nervous laugh.) Okay? Because I am not authorized to give you this information. Okay?"

I told him I understood because people could lose their jobs over this and he said, "That's correct."

As I write this I sure hope he isn't the ONLY tech who works there because I would not want to see him suffer for the crime of telling me the truth.

During another call I made the person on the phone flatly refused to tell me what the cycle value is, advising me instead to ask my physician to obtain that number for me. I told her my physician was probably already quite busy and that I wasn't going to bother her with this. Not to mention that my physician might also be reluctant to become involved in the dissemination of such sensitive information for fear of the repercussions it might have upon their career.

So it turns out that there is probably a good reason, from the point of view, perhaps, of those with an interest in amplifying the COVID fear factor in Ontario, why the PCR cycle value is being treated as though it were some sort of a state secret.

So, until I hear differently, I will use the 45 cycle number for Ontario PCR tests.

---

Conclusion:

Destroying the social and economic life of Ontario on the basis of 45 cycle PCR tests is sheer, destructive lunacy.

---

If the embedded video above does not play try using the link below,

"Science" Reaches Peak Idiocy

http://newtube.app/user/BS_Detection/E3Dsxoj

Crimes of Poverty

Over the decades I spent in the taxi business in my city, I was the target of ‘crimes of poverty’ many, many times. This usually came in the form of fare fraud when a customer would ride in my taxi knowing they lacked the means to pay for the ride.

Early on in my "career," I tried calling the police on these practitioners of ‘crimes of poverty’ but soon learned that was an almost complete waste of time. The police would take forever to respond and, usually, the responding officer would say to me, "well, what do you want me to do about it?" About thirty years ago one cop told me he could give me the perp's name and address for a $3.50 theft and I could pursue satisfaction in small claims court. Even then I wasn't that dumb.

It was a valid point. You can't get blood out of stones. The only recourse, therefore, is to avoid the stones in the first place even if it means racial profiling. Over the last twenty years or so in the biz I never called the cops at all. I would just accept the loss and get back to "work."

Once I became experienced enough at sniffing out the rip artists, I was successful at reducing the frequency of these "crimes of poverty" to about 10% of what they were before I learned a few tricks of the trade. (Similarly, I was able to reduce the frequency of vomit incidents too.)

There was no other choice.

U.S. City May Pass “Duress Legislation” to Give Criminals “Poverty Defense”

Just Ask your Pharmacist?

Yesterday, I went into a Shopper's Drug Mart to buy some ASA. While there, I noticed there was no one waiting at the pharmacy counter so I decided to ask the one person who was behind the counter a question that has been bugging me for some time now and that I HAVE NOT been able to find an answer for via internet searches or other inquiries.

I assumed the person was the pharmacist. He was the only one there, and he was wearing a long white coat. Who knows, maybe he was the janitor?

Anyway, I called out to him and said, "Excuse me, I have a question."

So he approached the plexiglass barrier apprehensively. When he stopped walking, about 500 meters from the barrier... just kidding... he was about a meter away from it, I asked him,

"Would you happen to know what the cycle value is for the PCR tests that are being used in Ontario?"

He didn't seem to hear the question. So I stepped to the side of the barrier in the hopes that he could hear me better from behind my lunatic-protection disguise, at which point, he withdrew a few meters in terror.

So I spoke MUCH LOUDER as I asked the same question a second time. He shook his head from side to side, indicating that he did not know.

So I asked him a second question.

"Are you aware of the controversy surrounding the reliability of PCR tests, especially when using high cycle values?"

Again, he didn't know.

I walked away thinking about all of those ads I hear about asking your pharmacist if you have any health care questions. Yeah, right.

I regretted not confirming with him whether he was the actual pharmacist as opposed to being the janitor, or the postage stamp clerk just filling in while the real pharmacist was in the washroom or something.

Here is a recent rant by Karl Denninger. I've been reading his stuff since I started smelling a rat in this whole scamdemic back in April and, for the most part as I have learned more over the last nine months, he has been bang on about almost everything.

No wonder he's so pissed off. I am too.

You Ready To Revolt Yet America?

---

---

"He also added that the body is capable of spontaneously clearing the virus"

The 2020 Wuhan Flu - A Conspiracy of Bullshit?

Real science on left, and on the right the abomination we've witnessed since March 2020.

My while life I've stood for the real thing. The fraudulent medieval muck on the right is abhorrent to me https://t.co/ksYRRpmfuB

— Ivor Cummins (@FatEmperor) December 26, 2020

No matter which side of the issue you find yourself on today, this documentary is worth the time.

It contains a valuable description of what a REAL pandemic looks like. When the Spanish Flu hit in 1918, the global population was less than 2 billion, yet the death toll was between 50 and 100 million. Today, that would equate to about 200 to 400 million deaths. The currently estimated death toll from the scamdemic is about 1.76 million or about 0.88% as bad as the Spanish Flu.

In 1918-19, countless millions of people's lives were ruined by the bug, itself, not by government edicts.

Today, the real virus is psychological, not biological.

To anyone who might claim that it would have been just as bad in 2020 as in 1918-19 if governments had not inflicted this unprecedented amount of economic, social, and psychological harm, it should be pointed out that not all jurisdictions opted to stumble into authoritarian dictatorships and the data, so far, shows that they have not fared any worse than those who did.

I have only watched the first two episodes so far but I will post all three here so that anyone interested enough to know if the last nine months of pure hell was even remotely worth it can watch it and make up their own minds - if it isn't censored that is.

And it has been pure hell for just about everyone.

In 1918, governments lost public trust because they played down the threat. In the event that the mass censorship attending the current crisis ultimately fails, public trust in government, Junk News, and Social(ist) media ought to, justifiably, have the same result for the opposite reason.

---

Supplementary

---

Doctoring the Definition

December 10 COVIDSCAM Roundup

Survival Rate Calculator

DECEMBER 8, 2020 RANT

Corporations can Flout the Law. YOU CAN'T.

Panicked COVID Man

DEC 1

Viral Impact in England The Empirical Truth Part 1

Dec 3 2020

George Hook Show - with Professor John Lee - Viral Reality!

George Hook with Mr. Martin Feeley - Vascular Surgeon on Viral Realities!

December 8

CRUCIAL Viral Update Dec 7th - Europe and USA Explained!

You would think after overwhelming evidence not just during the current moral panic, but from a century of dishonest corporate news & millennia of lying political leaders, the public would have started to wise up by now.

You would be wrong.

Lockdown - The Dark Side of History. Are we Doomed to Repeat it?

Danger: Contains Information and Opinion that Contradicts Politicians and the Junk News Media

Edmonton Nurse's Speech - 15:57

This video is considered "dangerous" by Twitter.

It has reportedly also been censored by Facebook.

Questions could be asked about this video. Is this a real nurse? Is she telling the truth?

And if people are allowed to ask those questions it gives us all the opportunity to decide if this is indeed a "dangerous" video OR, if it is really something that powerful interests, including politicians and their medical advisors who MAY HAVE committed criminal negligence in their handling of Coronavirus, the Junk News industry who DO NOT WANT THE PUBLIC to even question because of the disastrous impact it would have on public trust in those institutions, and, of course, the pharmaceutical giants who do not want this fabulous profit opportunity to slip away from them.

It's not hard for me to believe that this nurse's report is highly credible since I have been studying politicians and the Junk News media closely for almost half a century and they have ABSOLUTELY NO CREDIBILITY in my mind.

None.

Doctors Speak out Against the Rushed Vaccines.

Very dangerous opinions.

Some of the opinions expressed in this collection seems a bit far fetched, even for me. However, I think the public should be aware of these concerns before they russh out to get jabbed.

Even more frightening, from my point of view, is the number of Canadians who support the idea of mandatory vaccinations.

What strikes me as supremely ironic is the number of Canadians who are willing to goose-step into line when it comes to destroying their standard of living and their way of life in accordance with the "precautionary principle," when it comes to achieving climate stasis, or reducing the spread of a flu-like virus, only to do an absolute 180 on the precautionary principle when their lying politicians and Junk News allies tell them it's okay to take a brand new vaccine that was rushed into production in response to the greatest moral panic in history.

It's not that Canadians are that stupid. It's just that they don't possess the tools to make intelligent decisions. Mass censorship on social media doesn't help.

---

Corona The Simple Truth in Under 6 Minutes

click here to sign carbon tax petition.