Look at their lame reason for censoring this item.
Let's be clear about something, my post is not misleading. Characterizing it as misleading is dishonest, and downright sleazy. True, it does suggest the possibility that we may be dangerously close to full out nuclear war, so why would anyone be fishing for likes, follows, shares, or views on such a spammy topic? On second thoughts, why does anyone bother to post on Meta if they are not trying to get likes, follows, shares, or views?
What would Meta be if it did not attract people trying to get likes, follows, shares, or views? Maybe they should re-program the entire site and remove all "like," "follow" and "share" buttons?
And, after all, WW III is clearly spam when compared to the plethora of dog videos available on Meta.
The offending video appears below. Decide for your yourself if this is misleading or spam.
Russian Nuclear Sub & Navy Group Skim FLORIDA, US On HIGH ALERT, New Cuban Missile Crisis Feared
I don't usually contest Meta's abuses because it is about as effective as arguing with a KGB agent about the value of free speech. I went through the charade just to collect screenshots of the fraud.
I don't expect any change in their attitude, if they repond at all.
Aside from John Meyer having succumbed to the #ClimateScam, hook, line, and sinker, he has some very important insights into the utter hypocrisy, indeed corruption of Canada's ruling elites on the #ClimateScam issue.
I and others have been hammering away at this hypocrisy for years already.
1 - while Trudeau, his rent-seeking cronies, and a wide assortment of pink-haired, nose-ringed "activists" continue to scream bloody murder over Canada's CO2 emissions, they remain utterly mute over the emissions of countries like China and India, even though Canada's emissions are a drop in the bucket compared to these other countries. Instead of screwing up traffic, why aren't they engaging in "insurrections" at the Chinese and Indian embassies?
Conclusion: They do not seriously buy into the #ClimateScam. They have ulterior motives.
2 - also, while Trudeau, his rent-seeking cronies, and a wide assortment of pink-haired, nose-ringed "activists" continue to pull their hair out over Canada's CO2 emissions, they remain utterly mute over the mass importation of people from alien cultures, each of whom quadruple their contribution to the amount of CO2 they generate.
According to Mr. Meyer, the pressure being imposed on Canada's environment by irrational expansion of the Canadian population is the Number One issue when it comes to environmental degradation.
Conclusion: Trudeau, his rent-seeking cronies, a wide assortment of pink-haired, nose-ringed, road-blocking, art-defacing "activists" and naked old men rubbing their asses on rented bicycle seats don't give a rat's ass about the environment and the #ClimateScam. They have ulterior motives.
We should all be aware by now of the dirty tricks Facebook has been using for years now, to stifle certain opinions and information.
If you're not aware of this, then your head is stuck firmly up your ass, and you probably vote Liberal or NDP.
Not that I am shilling for the Conservatives, either. Doug Ford has been a bitter disappointment for libertarian-minded people - still better than the vomitous wokery of the McGuinty/Wynne years.
And though I would probably rather see Poilievre oust the current flaming charlatan, con-artist, grifter, drama teacher, make-up artist, and ski instructor, my expectations remain muted.
On the other hand, if you know what I am talking about, consider what life will be like when the entire internet, and your entire life, is just like Facebook, where your latitude for expressing your humanity is severely circumscribed. Via algorithms and anonymous "fact-checkers."
Cat videos are okay. But don't you dare question the safety and efficacy of the mRNA shots.
They will train you. You will learn to self-censor. We've had forty years of practice. They used to call it, "political correctness." It worked.
Don't you miss the days of political correctness, though? At least, back then, the worst you would experience was dirty looks and ostracism. Now you risk fucking jail.
The thought, to me, is an absolute nightmare. But what scares me more is that 99% of the hoi polloi won't even know it's happening,
Uber is just as adept with language sleaze as the Trudeau Liberals.
Let me demonstrate what "Engaged time per hour" really means.
Back around 2008, before City of Hamilton's politicians pulled the rug out from under the local taxi industry by pretending to believe that a taxi dispatched by an app was not a taxi, I spent a lot of time fishing for walk-ins at Hamilton's GO terminal.
Sometimes, the wait between fares could be as long as an hour, or more. It was, therefore, not unusual for the call of nature to arise in between engagements. Sometimes, while the driver was in the washroom, the first car in the government-engineered lineup of idle capital (10 to 15 taxis) would become engaged. Once that car left the line, the other cabs would all move up one spot.
I didn't like disrupting the smooth operation of the queue by being away from my cab at those times. A part time-driver named "Mikey" frequently visited the queue to socialize with the drivers who were "working." While he was there, I devised a solution to the problem of line disruption. I would pay Mikey a nickel for moving my cab up to the newly vacant spot in front of it whenever I had to use the can.
After a period of gainful employment, Mikey started to agitate for higher wages. He claimed the nickel I was paying him amounted to a slave's wage. That was when I beat Uber to the punch with the concept of "Engaged Time per Hour."
I argued thus: It only takes you ten seconds to get in the cab, turn the key, and move up one spot. You get a nickel for that. That nickel is equivalent to 6 times $0.05 = $0.30 per minute. And $0.30 per minute is equivalent to 60 times $0.30 = $18.00 "Per engaged hour." Once I had Uberized the pay calculation, I could not believe my own generosity. The other drivers were satisfied with the smoother operation of the line. The customers were satisfied too. Mikey remained skeptical.
At the time, that was approximately DOUBLE the minimum wage in Ontario. No one could slander me with the epithet, "Sweatshop operator."
Thereafter, Mikey became my most loyal employee.
We never got around to negotiating the fee involved had two cabs left the line, but I would have probably made a generous offer of $0.08 per move,($28.80 per engaged hour, - $40.87 in 2024 dollars!) given that the maneuver would still only require the same number of engine starts required to move up one spot.
Before posting the link, below, on Facebook, I got another Nazi-ish warning from their nebulous "Fact Checkers" urging me to think twice about posting it.
The warning says that, "Evidence shows that COVID-19 vaccines don't increase the risk of death blah blah blah."
Okay, so maybe that's true. But why does Facebook behave in such a despicable manner, clearly intended to stifle any debate on the issue?
Who the fuck are these people who think they can righteously decide what can or cannot be discussed?
The chart I have embedded for Canada's weekly death count's clearly show a conspicuous rise in the mortality numbers for Canadians between the ages of 0 and 45 since 2020.
Granted, the death rate for that age group started to spike in May 2020 (pink? magenta?) - before the vaccines were available. It peaked in July. I think that was caused by the combination of Jackboot NPI lockdowns and/or the free money for substance abusers, courtesy of Trudeau's clownish Liberal government. That July 2020 peak was exceeded in both July of 2022 and 2023. Vaccines? Or "Long Jackboot" deaths of despair? I don't know.
I spoke to a panhandler last week who told me the government has demanded he repay $38,000 in CERB. The maximum payout for someone taking advantage of the 28 week Liberal substance abuse promotion was $14,000 so the $38k number is dubious, but he may have also collected the CRB which followed CERB. However, when I asked him what he did with all that cash, he answered with one word, "Meth." I can believe that.
I do know someone else who poured his CERB into alcohol and meth, and a cab driver I know who worked the streets of Hamilton during the CERB Festival told me it was like New Year's Eve after the CERB started rolling. The addicts he drove were smiling from ear to ear while exclaiming, "This pandemic is the best thing that ever happened!"
CERB and the lockdowns ended, but the death rate in that age group has remained high ever since May 2020. The aqua line for 2023 leading up to November shows the death rate was the highest yet.
What has been killing so many of Canada's young people since the panic? Why is no one talking about it? And WHY is Facebook trying to censor any discussion of the issue?
